Publicatie

Publication date

Comorbidity and coexisting symptoms and infections presented ingeneral practice by COPD patients: Does livestock density in theresidential environment play a role?

Baliatsas, C., Borlée, F., Dijk, C.E. van, Star, B. van der, Zock, J.P., Smit, L.A.M., Spreeuwenberg, P., Heederik, D., Yzermans, C.J. Comorbidity and coexisting symptoms and infections presented ingeneral practice by COPD patients: Does livestock density in theresidential environment play a role? International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health: 2017, 220(4), p. 704-710.
Download the PDF
Objectives
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitute a potentially susceptible group towards environmental exposures such as livestock farm emissions, given their compromised respiratory health status. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between livestock exposure and comorbidities and coexisting symptoms and infections in COPD patients.

Methods
Data were collected from 1828 COPD patients (without co-occurring asthma) registered in 23 general practices and living in a rural area with a high livestock density. Prevalence of comorbid diseases/disorders and coexisting symptoms/infections were based on electronic health records from the year 2012. Various indicators of individual exposure to livestock were estimated based on residential addresses, using a geographic information system.

Results
At least one comorbid disorder was present in 69% of the COPD patients (especially cardiac disorders and depression, while 49% had at least one coexisting symptom and/or infection (especially upper respiratory tract infections, respiratory symptoms and pneumonia). Half of the COPD-patients resided less than 500 m of the nearest farm. Some positive as well as inverse associations were found between the examined outcomes and exposure estimates, although not consistent.

Conclusions
Despite the high prevalence of coexisting chronic and acute conditions presented in primary care by in COPD patients, this investigation found no convincing evidence for an association with livestock exposure estimates. There is a need for a replication of the present findings in studies with a longitudinal design, on different groups of potentially susceptible patients. Future research should also elucidate the biological plausibility of possible protective effects of exposure. (aut. ref.)