Publicatie

Publicatie datum

Nonverbal communication and conversational contribution in breast cancer genetic counseling: are counselors' nonverbal communication and conversational contribution associated with counselees' satisfaction, needs fulfillment and state anxiety in brea...

Dijkstra, H., Albada, A., Klöckner Cronauer, C., Ausems, M.G.E.M., Dulmen, S. van. Nonverbal communication and conversational contribution in breast cancer genetic counseling: are counselors' nonverbal communication and conversational contribution associated with counselees' satisfaction, needs fulfillment and state anxiety in breast cancer genetic counseling? Patient Education and Counseling: 2013, 93(2), p. 216-223.
Download de PDF
Objective: The current study aimed to examine how counselors’ nonverbal communication (i.e.
nonverbal encouragements and counselee-directed eye gaze) and conversational contribution (i.e.
verbal dominance and interactivity) during the final visit within breast cancer genetic counseling relate to counselee satisfaction, needs fulfillment and anxiety. Methods: Breast cancer counselees (N= 85) completed questionnaires measuring satisfaction, needs fulfillment and anxiety after the final consultation and anxiety before the initial visit. Consultations were videotaped. Counselor nonverbal encouragements and counselee-directed eye gaze were coded. Verbal dominance and interactivity were measured using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Results: More counselor nonverbal encouragements and higher counselor verbal dominance were both significantly related to higher post-visit anxiety. Furthermore, counselor verbal dominance was associated with lower perceived needs fulfillment. No significant associations with eye gaze and interactivity were found. Conclusion: More research is needed on the relationship between nonverbal encouragements and anxiety. Given the unfavorable association of counselor verbal dominance with anxiety and needs fulfillment, more effort could be devoted to involve counselees in the dialog and reduce the counselor’s verbal contribution during the consultation. Practice implications: Interventions focused on increasing counselees’ contribution in the consultation may be beneficial to counselees. (aut. ref.)